Cold spots. Disembodied voices. Bone chilling winds or breezes. Mysterious raps or knocks. There are a number of occurrences that can be described as paranormal. After the application of scientific study has been performed, and no rational explanation for the occurrence can be found, that is. It's fascinating stuff, the subject of hauntings.
The world of the paranormal has gained intense popularity over the past several years. What with shows like "In Search Of" and "Sightings", the subject of the paranormal has always been out there in the entertainment scape. These days it's the era of the ghost hunter.

In the last few years, that place has been firmly held in place by a film series that has been said to be the scariest thing going. The "Paranormal Activity" movie series, of which there are three now. Their budgets are obviously low as the villain is of an invisible kind, and none of the actors have ever been seen in anything else (not by my eyes, anyway).
![]() |
(Katie Featherston, and Micah Sloat) |
The second film (2010) is about Kristi Rey (Sprague Grayden), Katie's sister. Kristi, her husband, teenage daughter, baby, and dog, are those victimised in this installment. Strange things begin to happen in her house, and the baby appears to be the main target. Katie does make a few appearances (it appears to be happening in tandem with the first film), the subject of the goings on in their youth getting touched on. It is learned that there is some sort of pact that the first born child of either of them belonged to the demon. (There is one rather effective sequence involving the missing baby.) After things really start to kick into high gear, Kristi decides to try and get rid of the demon and protect her family. They perform some cleansing ritual, and it appears to do the trick. That is until the possessed Katie shows up at her house and kills them all.

Are the girls raised as witches? We won't know. Well...not until "Paranormal Activity 4" comes out. Yep. It's either in developmental or pre-production stages. The plot hasn't been released, and the only cast member announced is Katie Featherston. The release date given is 2012, so...no idea what's going on with it.
This post was going to be a review of "PA 3", but the review for 3 is pretty much the same as the review I would give for 1 and 2. There are some effective moments. Creepy moments. But they are few and far between. Suspense can be a powerful tool when creating a spooky movie. Here the space of time between events is painfully plodding. The style of the film is from the perspective of the video camera and the one holding it. We as movie viewers are "seeing the taped footage". There are chunks of the film where there is entirely too much "tape" where nothing is going on. Some uneventful footage leading up to an event is useful and effective. Here it had me looking at the clock. All 3 need some serious editing. If there weren't so much filler, they all would be 100% better. Of course, that would make them all about a half an hour long...
I am not easily scared. That probably works against the effectiveness of the series for me. If you scare easily...I mean VERY easily...then you might get a charge out of them. Are they recommendable...hmm...if you have nothing better to do. Maybe.
I don't know these films but I enjoyed reading your take on them. Here in the UK a movie version of Susan Hill's very creepy book - which became a successful play - has just come out and looks a bit special.
ReplyDelete